Global Ethics Corner: Taiwan: Is there a Statute of Limitation on Corruption?

May 27, 2011

Can corruption be legitimized by common usage, legal process, or subsequent legislation? Should old crimes go unpunished by legislative amnesty? Or is it more important simply to correct the abuse and move forward?

Can corruption be legitimized by common usage, legal process, or subsequent legislation?

Transparency International publishes a yearly index of corruption, which measures the transparency of government activities and the accountability of public officials.

Among the 2010 rankings are: Germany at number 15, the U.S at 22, Taiwan at 33, and Italy at 67. In relative terms, Taiwan today is clean, in the top 20 percent, a model for others.

However for decades in Taiwan, tens of thousands of senior public officials received "special allowance funds." These funds, often large, were for job- related expenses. They required receipts for one-half, and did not require receipts for the other half.

In fact, standard practice treated these funds as a way of providing larger salaries without showing them on the public records, as official corruption, and receipts were often missing.

Scandals broke out in 2006 regarding almost all the major political figures. The current president was acquitted of embezzlement, and the former president is in jail for corruption.

The political defense was customary usage: "everyone did it." The legal defense often was that laws were followed, receipts were provided.

In 2011 the Legislature passed a revised Accounting Act, which absolved most officials of liability for misuse of special funds, if the misuse occurred before January 2007.

What do you think? Is "everyone did it" a legitimate response? Was meeting the technical receipt requirements enough? Should old crimes go unpunished by legislative amnesty? Or is it more important simply to correct the abuse and move forward?

By William Vocke

For more information, see:

"Corruption Perceptions Index 2010," Transparency International, 2010

"Legislature decriminalizes fund abuse," The China Post, May 4, 2011, p. 20.

Dave Graham, Reuters, and The China Post news staff, "US Slips to historic low in global corruption index," The China Post, October 11, 2011

"Taiwan opposition candidate cleared of graft charges," M & C news, December, 28, 2007


Photo Credits in order of Appearance:

visionshare
Transparency International
TheronLabounty
Jacky Wong
Cloud
Davidreid
Jidanni
James
Studio -Thinkstock - Court Law - 78397123
Brand X Pictures/ Thinkstock

You may also like

SEP 12, 2024 Article

From Principles to Action: Charting a Path for Military AI Governance

As AI reshapes war's ethical dimensions, stakeholders must work together on greater transparency and governance efforts for this emerging technology, writes Dr. Brianna Rosen.

JUL 31, 2024 Podcast

Responsible AI & the Ethical Trade-offs of Large Models, with Sara Hooker

In this episode, Senior Fellow Anja Kaspersen speaks with Cohere for AI's Sara Hooker to discuss model design, model bias, and data representation.

JUL 30, 2024 Article

Risking Escalation for the Sake of Efficiency: Ethical Implications of AI Decision-Making in Conflicts

As military strategists explore the use of AI, we must address the ethical and safety concerns of these systems, writes Stanford's Dr. Max Lamparth.

No traducido

Este contenido aún no ha sido traducido a su idioma. Puede solicitar una traducción haciendo clic en el botón de abajo.

Solicitar traducción