Global Ethics Corner: Training SEAL Team 6: The Point of the Sword

May 20, 2011

Could SEAL Team 6 have captured bin Laden alive? Should training for elite military forces prioritize thoughtfulness at the risk of indecision?

Could SEAL Team 6 have captured bin Laden?

Plans for assaulting bin Laden's hideout and for subsequent interrogation suggest that orders were to capture him alive if possible. Let's assume no implicit suggestion to assassinate bin Laden, and put aside the location in Pakistan.

The question then is training.

In training elite military forces, countries make choices. Exaggerating the choice, do you nurture robotic killers, risking thoughtless acts, or philosopher warriors, risking indecision?

Every country effectively trains for physical and combat capabilities. Navy Sea-Air-Land Teams, the SEAL Teams, are often America's elite.

Only about 20 percent of candidates make it through intense training. After years on a regular SEAL Team, members apply to join SEAL Team 6. Only about 50 percent make it. There is little doubt that Team 6 has the skills to be effective killers.

Training to make thoughtful decisions is trickier. The circumstances are often intense, quick, and dangerous. Thinking takes time; extra time creates deadly risks.

Nevertheless, in theory the careful use of deadly force is learned by every police cadet. Similarly, ex-SEAL, Dr. Greitens, states "...we can be thoughtful, disciplined and proportional in our use of force." Regarding bin Laden's death, ex-SEAL, Lalo Roberti says, "For us to take a shot, it must be bad…"

Apparently, SEAL Team 6 was trusted to make thoughtful, on-the-spot, rapid decisions about life or death.

Do you agree? Or, could bin Laden have been captured? What would you emphasize in training? Should thoughtfulness have higher priority, at the risk of indecision?

By William Vocke

For more information see:

Elizabeth Bumiller, "Killing puts a spotlight on a secret elite force," International Herald Tribune, May 6, 2011 p. 1+

Eric Schmitt, Thom Shanker, and David E. Sanger, "Commandos were ready to take on Pakistanis," International Herald Tribune, May 11, 2011, p.1+

Michiko Kakutani, "Muscle Memory: The Training of Navy Seals Commandos," The New York Times, May 8, 2011.

Photo Credits in order of Appearance:

Pete Souza
Sajjad Ali Qureshi
Eddie Harrison/ U.S. Navy
Jayme Pastoric/ U.S. Navy
Ashley Myers/ U.S. Navy
Shauntae Hinkle-Lymas
John Scorza/ U.S. Navy
Keith Williams/ U.S. Navy
Charles McCain
Ashly Myers/ U.S. Navy
Eddie Harrison/ U.S. Navy

You may also like

SEP 12, 2024 Article

From Principles to Action: Charting a Path for Military AI Governance

As AI reshapes war's ethical dimensions, stakeholders must work together on greater transparency and governance efforts for this emerging technology, writes Dr. Brianna Rosen.

JUL 31, 2024 Podcast

Responsible AI & the Ethical Trade-offs of Large Models, with Sara Hooker

In this episode, Senior Fellow Anja Kaspersen speaks with Cohere for AI's Sara Hooker to discuss model design, model bias, and data representation.

JUL 30, 2024 Article

Risking Escalation for the Sake of Efficiency: Ethical Implications of AI Decision-Making in Conflicts

As military strategists explore the use of AI, we must address the ethical and safety concerns of these systems, writes Stanford's Dr. Max Lamparth.

No traducido

Este contenido aún no ha sido traducido a su idioma. Puede solicitar una traducción haciendo clic en el botón de abajo.

Solicitar traducción