In the aftermath of popular uprisings in the Middle East, Western aid-donors are
confronted by a difficult dilemma. Should donors work with anti-democratic or
politically extremist domestic groups?
If donors do, they risk lending legitimacy to unacceptable political movements.
But if they disregard these actors, in effect working against them, donors risk
influencing the fledgling domestic democratic process.
This dilemma is most pressing for those working with political parties. To do
justice to popular will, parties must showcase an array of divergent political
options, giving voters a real choice.
As Egypt, Tunisia, and others tenuously embark on democratization, the first
tumultuous step is free and fair elections, and in the past few months, many
political parties were born. Lacking organizational structures, experienced
members, or programs, many parties struggle to perform basic democratic functions.
To help new parties overcome these difficulties, the transatlantic aid community
provides finances, material aid, training, and consulting, similar to Eastern
Europe in the 1990s. However, they are forced to choose between working with
or without some political parties, which may flout democratic principles and
values.
In Egypt for example, Mubarak's National Democratic Party or the Islamist Muslim
Brotherhood may be excluded. Hence, aid providers set a precedent for partisanship.
How can external aid providers know the future range of popular preferences
in former authoritarian systems? In any event, is excluding recipients inherently
undemocratic?
As aid providers begin assisting new parties in the Middle East, with whom should
they work? Is excluding some parties in the name of democracy justified? If
so, on what grounds? What do you think?
By Mladen
Joksic and Marlene
Spoerri
For more information see:
Spoerri, Marlene (2010) "Crossing the line: partisan party assistance in
post-Miloševic Serbia," Democratization, 17: 6, 1108 - 1131
Carothers, Thomas (2007) Confronting the Weakest Link: Aiding Political Parties
in New Democracies. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Burnell, Peter (2004) Building Better Democracy: Why Parties Matter. London:
Westminster Foundation for Democracy.
Photo Credits in order of Appearance:Kodak
AgfaKodak
AfgaRowan
El Shimi Nasser
Nouri MagharebiaDepartment
for International Development/Kate JosephTakver
Floris
Van CauwelaertNasser
Nouri
