Global Ethics Corner: America on a Global Ethics Thermometer: Image and Reality

Feb 25, 2011

How well do the institutions of government live up to the expectations of their people? What has America got right? What should it change? How do other countries measure up?

Who are the good guys and bad guys in international affairs? How do countries stack up?

The issue is not patriotism or nationalism. Most want to honor their country. Nor is the issue development, the level of wealth.

The issue is how well do the institutions of government live up to expectations?

Of course, expectations and their evaluation are tied to personal values, but most people have a sense of ethical state behavior. In people's minds some countries succeed, many fail, and most fall in between. Switzerland is seen by most as a success, Libya is an example of failure.

There are many objective indices for evaluating a country's behavior. Among them are: life expectancy at birth, economic transparency, educational performance, personal security, income equality, opportunity for advancement, [infant mortality, human rights protection, level of development, growth, environmental impact], etc.

People choose different combinations when they judge. Charles Blow in The New York Times uses nine indices to evaluate 33 countries, and concludes regarding the U.S. that "It's time for us to stop lying to ourselves about this country. …on a whole host of measures… we are among the worst of the worst." [The title is equally provocative, "Empire at the End of Decadence: American Shame."]

This is a stunning conclusion to many Americans. Is the U.S. number one only in its own eyes?

Think critically for a moment not about the America we love, but about the America depicted by dozens of indices. Is Blow right? If so, why do people around the world want to immigrate to the U.S.? What has America gotten right? What should change?

By William Vocke

For more information see:

Charles M. Blow, "Empire at the End of Decadence: American Shame," The New York Times, February 19, 2011, p. A19.

Photo Credits in order of Appearance:

Banalities
C-reel.com
M.V. Jantzen
José Cruz/ABr
Maggie Osama
Thinkstock/Polka Dot
UggBoy?UggGirl

Hajime Nakano
Sorent
Panagiotis V. Lazaridis
Sbw01f
Sbw01f
Alessandro
-{ thus }-
The U.S. Army
Gary McCabe
Mark Heard
The U.S. Army


http://www.flickr.com/photos/aeturnum/675199030/

You may also like

SEP 12, 2024 Article

From Principles to Action: Charting a Path for Military AI Governance

As AI reshapes war's ethical dimensions, stakeholders must work together on greater transparency and governance efforts for this emerging technology, writes Dr. Brianna Rosen.

JUL 31, 2024 Podcast

Responsible AI & the Ethical Trade-offs of Large Models, with Sara Hooker

In this episode, Senior Fellow Anja Kaspersen speaks with Cohere for AI's Sara Hooker to discuss model design, model bias, and data representation.

JUL 30, 2024 Article

Risking Escalation for the Sake of Efficiency: Ethical Implications of AI Decision-Making in Conflicts

As military strategists explore the use of AI, we must address the ethical and safety concerns of these systems, writes Stanford's Dr. Max Lamparth.

No traducido

Este contenido aún no ha sido traducido a su idioma. Puede solicitar una traducción haciendo clic en el botón de abajo.

Solicitar traducción