Marvin Kalb: La Doctrina Powell
Grabado el 22 de octubre de 2013
El autor y veterano reportero Marvin Kalb describe la Doctrina Powell, la filosofía en la que se basó la decisión de George H. W. Bush de golpear duramente a Irak y retirarse, en lugar de buscar un cambio de régimen.
The George H. W. Bush philosophy was born of something called the Powell Doctrine. Powell was the chief of the Joint Chiefs and was a national security advisor and a very bright general. Powell believed, based on the Vietnam experience, that if the United States goes to war, it has to have a clear military objective: Down the road, that's what I want to accomplish. I want to put the number of troops in that can take care of that problem, I want to have popular support, and I want to have an exit strategy. I want to go in, I want to accomplish it, and I want to get out.
That is what he said is the military's role. It's not there to build schools. It's a very important point.
George H. W. bought into that completely. That was, in a sense, the beauty of the Kuwait operation. We went in with vastly more troops than we needed, because Powell wanted to overwhelm the enemy. And he did. It was a 100-hour war. George H. W. then had before him the option of going up to Baghdad and taking care of the bad guy. People like Scowcroft said to him, "Mr. President, if you go up there, I can tell you right now, from the military point of view, we can do that. That's not hard. But once we get there, what do we do? Do we become the government? Who are the good guys we deal with? We couldn't tell you." And Bush wisely said, "We're not going."
Right now that Powell Doctrine, which you were alluding to, is something that exists in the far-out corners of the Washington strategic mind.
Suscríbase al Carnegie Ethics Newsletter para recibir más información sobre ética y asuntos internacionales.
Recursos relacionados
23 DE AGOSTO DE 2021 - Artículo
La ética de la salida de Afganistán
27 DE ABRIL DE 2005 - Transcripción
Perdiendo Irak: El fiasco de la reconstrucción de posguerra
Inicialmente partidario de ir a la guerra, Phillips, antiguo funcionario del Departamento de Estado, analiza los errores cometidos por la falta de un plan para ganar la paz.
5 DE MARZO DE 2003 - Transcripción
La guerra de Irak: Por qué Sadam debe irse... y por qué Estados Unidos debe liderarla
William Kristol y Lawrence Kaplan sostienen que el éxito del esfuerzo de construcción nacional en Irak no sólo será un catalizador del cambio en Oriente Medio, sino que también servirá como prueba de que existe una compatibilidad entre los intereses y los ideales estadounidenses.